TY - JOUR
T1 - Volumetric monitoring of cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers
T2 - can camera be as accurate as laser scanner?
AU - Zenteno, Omar
AU - González, Eduardo
AU - Treuillet, Sylvie
AU - Valencia, Braulio M.
AU - Castaneda, Benjamin
AU - Llanos-Cuentas, Alejandro
AU - Lucas, Yves
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/11/2
Y1 - 2019/11/2
N2 - Cavity volume is an important clinical index for the assessment of the healing process and effectiveness of treatment applied on chronic ulcers. Recently, 3D scanners have proven to effectively track ulcer’s volume evolution. However, photogrammetry presents itself as a low cost and portable alternative. We conducted a comparative study between photogrammetric and 3D scanner-based volume estimation of small skin ulcers. A total of 24 cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers’ virtual models were generated using a commercial laser scanner and a full-HD portable camera. The reconstruction from videos was performed using open-source software (VisualSFM). The results revealed a similar performance when compared to 3D Scan-based volume estimation with a median deviation and percentile error of 33.68 mm3 and 21.10%, respectively. In addition, the method proved to effectively follow the same tendency in the assessment of healing ulcers when compared to the 3D-scanner. Moreover, when comparing the two virtual models trough residual differences after ICP registration the mean error and standard deviation was 0.36 ± 0.27 mm.
AB - Cavity volume is an important clinical index for the assessment of the healing process and effectiveness of treatment applied on chronic ulcers. Recently, 3D scanners have proven to effectively track ulcer’s volume evolution. However, photogrammetry presents itself as a low cost and portable alternative. We conducted a comparative study between photogrammetric and 3D scanner-based volume estimation of small skin ulcers. A total of 24 cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers’ virtual models were generated using a commercial laser scanner and a full-HD portable camera. The reconstruction from videos was performed using open-source software (VisualSFM). The results revealed a similar performance when compared to 3D Scan-based volume estimation with a median deviation and percentile error of 33.68 mm3 and 21.10%, respectively. In addition, the method proved to effectively follow the same tendency in the assessment of healing ulcers when compared to the 3D-scanner. Moreover, when comparing the two virtual models trough residual differences after ICP registration the mean error and standard deviation was 0.36 ± 0.27 mm.
KW - 3D scanning
KW - Leishmaniasis
KW - photogrammetry
KW - volumetric measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057521709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21681163.2018.1546623
DO - 10.1080/21681163.2018.1546623
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057521709
SN - 2168-1163
VL - 7
SP - 667
EP - 675
JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
IS - 5-6
ER -