TY - JOUR
T1 - Roles and legitimacy of the communal indigenous authorities
T2 - landlords, ruwales and relations with the State in Q’ero communities (Cusco, Peru, 1922-2020)
AU - Carreño, Guillermo Salas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AUTORES, 2023
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This article analyzes the roles and legitimacy of the communal authorities at the Q’ero hacienda (Paucartambo, Cusco) and the communities emerging therefrom. The colonial state established the hacienda in the XVII century. However, in 1922, its authority structure was more characteristic of communities descending from colonial Councils of Indians (Cabildos de Indios). Based on ethnographic records beginning in 1922 and fieldwork conducted in 2007 and 2008, the article shows how communal indigenous authorities, whose external legitimacy came from the landlord and the state, were essential to organizing hacienda work. As part of their role as mediators between humans and ruwales (places with agency and intentionality), these authorities were responsible for the rainy season festivities. When the hacienda closed in the 1960s, the state recognized these collectives as ‘peasant communities’ and imposed a new authority structure. While these new authorities were in charge of the relations with the state, the communal indigenous authorities continued in their roles. Their legitimacy emerged directly from the community of humans and ruwales and was only weakly tied to the state.
AB - This article analyzes the roles and legitimacy of the communal authorities at the Q’ero hacienda (Paucartambo, Cusco) and the communities emerging therefrom. The colonial state established the hacienda in the XVII century. However, in 1922, its authority structure was more characteristic of communities descending from colonial Councils of Indians (Cabildos de Indios). Based on ethnographic records beginning in 1922 and fieldwork conducted in 2007 and 2008, the article shows how communal indigenous authorities, whose external legitimacy came from the landlord and the state, were essential to organizing hacienda work. As part of their role as mediators between humans and ruwales (places with agency and intentionality), these authorities were responsible for the rainy season festivities. When the hacienda closed in the 1960s, the state recognized these collectives as ‘peasant communities’ and imposed a new authority structure. While these new authorities were in charge of the relations with the state, the communal indigenous authorities continued in their roles. Their legitimacy emerged directly from the community of humans and ruwales and was only weakly tied to the state.
KW - carnival
KW - communal authorities
KW - hacienda
KW - non-humans
KW - peasant community
KW - state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203502075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2023-0021
DO - 10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2023-0021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203502075
SN - 0716-0925
VL - 69
JO - Estudios Atacamenos
JF - Estudios Atacamenos
M1 - e5501
ER -