TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent profiles of achievement goal-complexes
T2 - their relationship with students’ behavioral and agentic engagement
AU - Benita, Moti
AU - Matos, Lennia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This prospective study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to explore the reasons underlying mastery-approach (MAp) and performance-approach (PAp) goals, examining their relationship with students’ and teachers’ reports on students’ behavioral and agentic engagement in mathematics. Participants were 395 Peruvian high school students. Five goal-complex profiles emerged for each goal. Latent profile analysis identified five distinct motivational profiles for each goal type, revealing that most students endorsed goals for both autonomous and controlled reasons. Students in profiles characterized by high autonomous reasons had increased student-reported engagement, whereas those in profiles characterized by low autonomous reasons had reduced engagement, regardless of controlled motivation. Conversely, teacher-reported engagement was higher in profiles characterized by low controlled reasons, and lower in those with high controlled reasons, regardless of students’ autonomous motivation. This person-centered approach provides nuanced insights into how combinations of autonomous and controlled reasons underlying MAp and PAp goals are endorsed by subgroups of students and how they relate to students’ behavioral and agentic engagement.
AB - This prospective study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to explore the reasons underlying mastery-approach (MAp) and performance-approach (PAp) goals, examining their relationship with students’ and teachers’ reports on students’ behavioral and agentic engagement in mathematics. Participants were 395 Peruvian high school students. Five goal-complex profiles emerged for each goal. Latent profile analysis identified five distinct motivational profiles for each goal type, revealing that most students endorsed goals for both autonomous and controlled reasons. Students in profiles characterized by high autonomous reasons had increased student-reported engagement, whereas those in profiles characterized by low autonomous reasons had reduced engagement, regardless of controlled motivation. Conversely, teacher-reported engagement was higher in profiles characterized by low controlled reasons, and lower in those with high controlled reasons, regardless of students’ autonomous motivation. This person-centered approach provides nuanced insights into how combinations of autonomous and controlled reasons underlying MAp and PAp goals are endorsed by subgroups of students and how they relate to students’ behavioral and agentic engagement.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021406623
U2 - 10.1007/s11031-025-10179-1
DO - 10.1007/s11031-025-10179-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105021406623
SN - 0146-7239
JO - Motivation and Emotion
JF - Motivation and Emotion
ER -