TY - GEN
T1 - Detection and phenotyping of retinal disease using AM-FM processing for feature extraction
AU - Agurto, Carla
AU - Murillo, Sergio
AU - Murray, Victor
AU - Pattichis, Marios
AU - Russell, Stephen
AU - Abramoff, Michael
AU - Soliz, Pete
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - We present the application of an Amplitude- Modulation Frequency-Modulation (AM-FM) method for extracting potentially relevant features towards the classification of diseased retinas from healthy retinas. In terms of AM-FM features, we use histograms of the instantaneous amplitude, the angle of the instantaneous frequency and the magnitude of the instantaneous frequency extracted over different frequency scales. To classify the AM-FM features, we use a combination of a clustering method and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Using 18 images from each of the four risk levels, three experiments were performed to test the algorithm's ability to differentiate the controls (Risk 0) from each of the three levels of pathology, i.e. Risk 1, Risk 2, and Risk 3. For Risk 0 versus Risk 3 an area under the receiver operating system (AROC) of 0.99 was achieved with a best sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95%. For Risk 0 versus Risk 2, the AROC was 0.96 with 94% sensitivity and 85% specificity. For Risk 0 versus Risk 1, the AROC was 0.93 and a sensitivity/specificity of 94%/67%.
AB - We present the application of an Amplitude- Modulation Frequency-Modulation (AM-FM) method for extracting potentially relevant features towards the classification of diseased retinas from healthy retinas. In terms of AM-FM features, we use histograms of the instantaneous amplitude, the angle of the instantaneous frequency and the magnitude of the instantaneous frequency extracted over different frequency scales. To classify the AM-FM features, we use a combination of a clustering method and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Using 18 images from each of the four risk levels, three experiments were performed to test the algorithm's ability to differentiate the controls (Risk 0) from each of the three levels of pathology, i.e. Risk 1, Risk 2, and Risk 3. For Risk 0 versus Risk 3 an area under the receiver operating system (AROC) of 0.99 was achieved with a best sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95%. For Risk 0 versus Risk 2, the AROC was 0.96 with 94% sensitivity and 85% specificity. For Risk 0 versus Risk 1, the AROC was 0.93 and a sensitivity/specificity of 94%/67%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349669130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ACSSC.2008.5074489
DO - 10.1109/ACSSC.2008.5074489
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70349669130
SN - 9781424429417
T3 - Conference Record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers
SP - 659
EP - 663
BT - 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, ASILOMAR 2008
T2 - 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, ASILOMAR 2008
Y2 - 26 October 2008 through 29 October 2008
ER -