Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

Daniel Conroy-Beam; David M. Buss; Kelly Asao; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Toivo Aavik; Grace Akello; Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba; Charlotte Alm; Naumana Amjad; Afifa Anjum; Chiemezie S. Atama; Derya Atamtürk Duyar; Richard Ayebare; Carlota Batres; Mons Bendixen; Aicha Bensafia; Boris Bizumic; Mahmoud Boussena; Marina Butovskaya; Seda Can; Katarzyna Cantarero; Antonin Carrier; Hakan Cetinkaya; Ilona Croy; Rosa María Cueto; Marcin Czub; Daria Dronova; Seda Dural; Izzet Duyar; Berna Ertugrul; Agustín Espinosa; Ignacio Estevan; Carla Sofia Esteves; Luxi Fang; Tomasz Frackowiak; Jorge Contreras Garduño; Karina Ugalde González; Farida Guemaz; Petra Gyuris; Mária Halamová; Iskra Herak; Marina Horvat; Ivana Hromatko; Chin Ming Hui; Jas Laile Jaafar; Feng Jiang; Konstantinos Kafetsios; Tina Kavčič; Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair; Nicolas Kervyn; Truong Thi Khanh Ha; Imran Ahmed Khilji; Nils C. Köbis; Hoang Moc Lan; András Láng; Georgina R. Lennard; Ernesto León; Torun Lindholm; Trinh Thi Linh; Giulia Lopez; Nguyen Van Luot; Alvaro Mailhos; Zoi Manesi; Rocio Martinez; Sarah L. McKerchar; Norbert Mesko; Girishwar Misra; Conal Monaghan; Emanuel C. Mora; Alba Moya-Garófano; Bojan Musil; Jean Carlos Natividade; Agnieszka Niemczyk; George Nizharadze; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Mohd Sofian Bin Omar-Fauzee; Ike E. Onyishi; Baris Özener; Ariela Francesca Pagani; Vilmante Pakalniskiene; Miriam Parise; Farid Pazhoohi; Annette Pisanski; Katarzyna Pisanski; Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano; Camelia Popa; Pavol Prokop; Muhammad Rizwan; Mario Sainz; Svjetlana Salkičević; Ruta Sargautyte; Ivan Sarmány-Schuller; Susanne Schmehl; Shivantika Sharad; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Franco Simonetti; Stanislava Stoyanova; Meri Tadinac; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Christin Melanie Vauclair; Luis Diego Vega; Dwi Ajeng Widarini; Gyesook Yoo; Marta ZaÅ¥kovÃ¡; Maja ZupanÄ iÄ

Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

Daniel Conroy-Beam
, David M. Buss
, Kelly Asao
, Agnieszka Sorokowska
, Piotr Sorokowski
, Toivo Aavik
, Grace Akello
, Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba
, Charlotte Alm
, Naumana Amjad
, Afifa Anjum
, Chiemezie S. Atama
, Derya Atamtürk Duyar
, Richard Ayebare
, Carlota Batres
, Mons Bendixen
, Aicha Bensafia
, Boris Bizumic
, Mahmoud Boussena
, Marina Butovskaya

Seda Can, Katarzyna Cantarero, Antonin Carrier, Hakan Cetinkaya, Ilona Croy, Rosa María Cueto, Marcin Czub, Daria Dronova, Seda Dural, Izzet Duyar, Berna Ertugrul, Agustín Espinosa, Ignacio Estevan, Carla Sofia Esteves, Luxi Fang, Tomasz Frackowiak, Jorge Contreras Garduño, Karina Ugalde González, Farida Guemaz, Petra Gyuris, Mária Halamová, Iskra Herak, Marina Horvat, Ivana Hromatko, Chin Ming Hui, Jas Laile Jaafar, Feng Jiang, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Tina Kavčič, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Nicolas Kervyn, Truong Thi Khanh Ha, Imran Ahmed Khilji, Nils C. Köbis, Hoang Moc Lan, András Láng, Georgina R. Lennard, Ernesto León, Torun Lindholm, Trinh Thi Linh, Giulia Lopez, Nguyen Van Luot, Alvaro Mailhos, Zoi Manesi, Rocio Martinez, Sarah L. McKerchar, Norbert Mesko, Girishwar Misra, Conal Monaghan, Emanuel C. Mora, Alba Moya-Garófano, Bojan Musil, Jean Carlos Natividade, Agnieszka Niemczyk, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Mohd Sofian Bin Omar-Fauzee, Ike E. Onyishi, Baris Özener, Ariela Francesca Pagani, Vilmante Pakalniskiene, Miriam Parise, Farid Pazhoohi, Annette Pisanski, Katarzyna Pisanski, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Camelia Popa, Pavol Prokop, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz, Svjetlana Salkičević, Ruta Sargautyte, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller, Susanne Schmehl, Shivantika Sharad, Razi Sultan Siddiqui, Franco Simonetti, Stanislava Stoyanova, Meri Tadinac, Marco Antonio Correa Varella, Christin Melanie Vauclair, Luis Diego Vega, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo, Marta ZaÅ¥kovÃ¡, Maja ZupanÄ iÄ

University of California, Santa Barbara
The University of Texas at Austin
University of Wroclaw
Technische Universität Dresden
Tartu Ülikool
Gulu University
Middle East University, Jordan
Stockholms universitet
University of the Punjab
University of Nigeria
Istanbul Üniversitesi
North Star Alliance
Marshall University
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Université d’Alger 2
The Australian National University
Russian State University for the Humanities
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Izmir Ekonomi Universitesi
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny
Université Catholique de Louvain
Ankara Üniversitesi
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
Universidad de la República
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
Chinese University of Hong Kong
UNAM Campus Morelia
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
Mohamed Lamine Dabbaghine University of Setif 2
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra
Univerza v Mariboru
University of Zagreb
Universiti Malaya
Central University of Finance and Economics
University of Crete
University of Primorska
Vietnam National University Hanoi
IMCB
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Universidad de Granada
University of Delhi
Universidad de La Habana
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Free Unviersity of Tbilisi
Universität Wien
Universiti Utara Malaysia
Vilniaus Universitetas
The University of British Columbia
University of Sussex
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Academia Româna
Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave
Slovak Academy of Sciences
The Delve Pvt Ltd
Universidad de Monterrey
Vivekananda College
DHA Suffa University
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
South-West University Neofit Rilski
Universidade de São Paulo
University Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Kyung Hee University
Univerza v Ljubljani

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

51 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.

Idioma original	Español
Publicación	Scientific Reports
Volumen	9
Estado	Publicada - 1 dic. 2019

Citar esto

Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Alhabahba, M. M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Atama, C. S., Duyar, D. A., Ayebare, R., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., Boussena, M., ... ZupanÄ iÄ, M. (2019). Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries. Scientific Reports, 9.

@article{04a5a91001b24e3091209ac9a5f6e3f4,

title = "Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries",

abstract = "Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.",

author = "Daniel Conroy-Beam and Buss, \{David M.\} and Kelly Asao and Agnieszka Sorokowska and Piotr Sorokowski and Toivo Aavik and Grace Akello and Alhabahba, \{Mohammad Madallh\} and Charlotte Alm and Naumana Amjad and Afifa Anjum and Atama, \{Chiemezie S.\} and Duyar, \{Derya Atamt{\"u}rk\} and Richard Ayebare and Carlota Batres and Mons Bendixen and Aicha Bensafia and Boris Bizumic and Mahmoud Boussena and Marina Butovskaya and Seda Can and Katarzyna Cantarero and Antonin Carrier and Hakan Cetinkaya and Ilona Croy and Cueto, \{Rosa Mar{\'i}a\} and Marcin Czub and Daria Dronova and Seda Dural and Izzet Duyar and Berna Ertugrul and Agust{\'i}n Espinosa and Ignacio Estevan and Esteves, \{Carla Sofia\} and Luxi Fang and Tomasz Frackowiak and Gardu{\~n}o, \{Jorge Contreras\} and Gonz{\'a}lez, \{Karina Ugalde\} and Farida Guemaz and Petra Gyuris and M{\'a}ria Halamov{\'a} and Iskra Herak and Marina Horvat and Ivana Hromatko and Hui, \{Chin Ming\} and Jaafar, \{Jas Laile\} and Feng Jiang and Konstantinos Kafetsios and Tina Kav{\v c}i{\v c} and Kennair, \{Leif Edward Ottesen\} and Nicolas Kervyn and \{Thi Khanh Ha\}, Truong and Khilji, \{Imran Ahmed\} and K{\"o}bis, \{Nils C.\} and Lan, \{Hoang Moc\} and Andr{\'a}s L{\'a}ng and Lennard, \{Georgina R.\} and Ernesto Le{\'o}n and Torun Lindholm and \{Thi Linh\}, Trinh and Giulia Lopez and \{Van Luot\}, Nguyen and Alvaro Mailhos and Zoi Manesi and Rocio Martinez and McKerchar, \{Sarah L.\} and Norbert Mesko and Girishwar Misra and Conal Monaghan and Mora, \{Emanuel C.\} and Alba Moya-Gar{\'o}fano and Bojan Musil and Natividade, \{Jean Carlos\} and Agnieszka Niemczyk and George Nizharadze and Elisabeth Oberzaucher and Anna Oleszkiewicz and Omar-Fauzee, \{Mohd Sofian Bin\} and Onyishi, \{Ike E.\} and Baris {\"O}zener and Pagani, \{Ariela Francesca\} and Vilmante Pakalniskiene and Miriam Parise and Farid Pazhoohi and Annette Pisanski and Katarzyna Pisanski and \{Tinoco Ponciano\}, \{Edna L{\'u}cia\} and Camelia Popa and Pavol Prokop and Muhammad Rizwan and Mario Sainz and Svjetlana Salki{\v c}evi{\'c} and Ruta Sargautyte and Ivan Sarm{\'a}ny-Schuller and Susanne Schmehl and Shivantika Sharad and Siddiqui, \{Razi Sultan\} and Franco Simonetti and Stanislava Stoyanova and Meri Tadinac and Varella, \{Marco Antonio Correa\} and Vauclair, \{Christin Melanie\} and Vega, \{Luis Diego\} and Widarini, \{Dwi Ajeng\} and Gyesook Yoo and Marta Za{\AA}¥kov{\~A}¡ and \{Zupan{\"A} i{\"A}\}, Maja",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "9",

journal = "Scientific Reports",

issn = "2045-2322",

}

Conroy-Beam, D, Buss, DM, Asao, K, Sorokowska, A, Sorokowski, P, Aavik, T, Akello, G, Alhabahba, MM, Alm, C, Amjad, N, Anjum, A, Atama, CS, Duyar, DA, Ayebare, R, Batres, C, Bendixen, M, Bensafia, A, Bizumic, B, Boussena, M, Butovskaya, M, Can, S, Cantarero, K, Carrier, A, Cetinkaya, H, Croy, I, Cueto, RM, Czub, M, Dronova, D, Dural, S, Duyar, I, Ertugrul, B, Espinosa, A, Estevan, I, Esteves, CS, Fang, L, Frackowiak, T, Garduño, JC, González, KU, Guemaz, F, Gyuris, P, Halamová, M, Herak, I, Horvat, M, Hromatko, I, Hui, CM, Jaafar, JL, Jiang, F, Kafetsios, K, Kavčič, T, Kennair, LEO, Kervyn, N, Thi Khanh Ha, T, Khilji, IA, Köbis, NC, Lan, HM, Láng, A, Lennard, GR, León, E, Lindholm, T, Thi Linh, T, Lopez, G, Van Luot, N, Mailhos, A, Manesi, Z, Martinez, R, McKerchar, SL, Mesko, N, Misra, G, Monaghan, C, Mora, EC, Moya-Garófano, A, Musil, B, Natividade, JC, Niemczyk, A, Nizharadze, G, Oberzaucher, E, Oleszkiewicz, A, Omar-Fauzee, MSB, Onyishi, IE, Özener, B, Pagani, AF, Pakalniskiene, V, Parise, M, Pazhoohi, F, Pisanski, A, Pisanski, K, Tinoco Ponciano, EL, Popa, C, Prokop, P, Rizwan, M, Sainz, M, Salkičević, S, Sargautyte, R, Sarmány-Schuller, I, Schmehl, S, Sharad, S, Siddiqui, RS, Simonetti, F, Stoyanova, S, Tadinac, M, Varella, MAC, Vauclair, CM, Vega, LD, Widarini, DA, Yoo, G, ZaÅ¥kovÃ¡, M & ZupanÄ iÄ, M 2019, 'Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries', Scientific Reports, vol. 9.

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

AU - Conroy-Beam, Daniel

AU - Buss, David M.

AU - Asao, Kelly

AU - Sorokowska, Agnieszka

AU - Sorokowski, Piotr

AU - Aavik, Toivo

AU - Akello, Grace

AU - Alhabahba, Mohammad Madallh

AU - Alm, Charlotte

AU - Amjad, Naumana

AU - Anjum, Afifa

AU - Atama, Chiemezie S.

AU - Duyar, Derya Atamtürk

AU - Ayebare, Richard

AU - Batres, Carlota

AU - Bendixen, Mons

AU - Bensafia, Aicha

AU - Bizumic, Boris

AU - Boussena, Mahmoud

AU - Butovskaya, Marina

AU - Can, Seda

AU - Cantarero, Katarzyna

AU - Carrier, Antonin

AU - Cetinkaya, Hakan

AU - Croy, Ilona

AU - Cueto, Rosa María

AU - Czub, Marcin

AU - Dronova, Daria

AU - Dural, Seda

AU - Duyar, Izzet

AU - Ertugrul, Berna

AU - Espinosa, Agustín

AU - Estevan, Ignacio

AU - Esteves, Carla Sofia

AU - Fang, Luxi

AU - Frackowiak, Tomasz

AU - Garduño, Jorge Contreras

AU - González, Karina Ugalde

AU - Guemaz, Farida

AU - Gyuris, Petra

AU - Halamová, Mária

AU - Herak, Iskra

AU - Horvat, Marina

AU - Hromatko, Ivana

AU - Hui, Chin Ming

AU - Jaafar, Jas Laile

AU - Jiang, Feng

AU - Kafetsios, Konstantinos

AU - Kavčič, Tina

AU - Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen

AU - Kervyn, Nicolas

AU - Thi Khanh Ha, Truong

AU - Khilji, Imran Ahmed

AU - Köbis, Nils C.

AU - Lan, Hoang Moc

AU - Láng, András

AU - Lennard, Georgina R.

AU - León, Ernesto

AU - Lindholm, Torun

AU - Thi Linh, Trinh

AU - Lopez, Giulia

AU - Van Luot, Nguyen

AU - Mailhos, Alvaro

AU - Manesi, Zoi

AU - Martinez, Rocio

AU - McKerchar, Sarah L.

AU - Mesko, Norbert

AU - Misra, Girishwar

AU - Monaghan, Conal

AU - Mora, Emanuel C.

AU - Moya-Garófano, Alba

AU - Musil, Bojan

AU - Natividade, Jean Carlos

AU - Niemczyk, Agnieszka

AU - Nizharadze, George

AU - Oberzaucher, Elisabeth

AU - Oleszkiewicz, Anna

AU - Omar-Fauzee, Mohd Sofian Bin

AU - Onyishi, Ike E.

AU - Özener, Baris

AU - Pagani, Ariela Francesca

AU - Pakalniskiene, Vilmante

AU - Parise, Miriam

AU - Pazhoohi, Farid

AU - Pisanski, Annette

AU - Pisanski, Katarzyna

AU - Tinoco Ponciano, Edna Lúcia

AU - Popa, Camelia

AU - Prokop, Pavol

AU - Rizwan, Muhammad

AU - Sainz, Mario

AU - Salkičević, Svjetlana

AU - Sargautyte, Ruta

AU - Sarmány-Schuller, Ivan

AU - Schmehl, Susanne

AU - Sharad, Shivantika

AU - Siddiqui, Razi Sultan

AU - Simonetti, Franco

AU - Stoyanova, Stanislava

AU - Tadinac, Meri

AU - Varella, Marco Antonio Correa

AU - Vauclair, Christin Melanie

AU - Vega, Luis Diego

AU - Widarini, Dwi Ajeng

AU - Yoo, Gyesook

AU - ZaÅ¥kovÃ¡, Marta

AU - ZupanÄ iÄ, Maja

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.

AB - Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.

M3 - Artículo

SN - 2045-2322

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

ER -