TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-production for Urban Equality: Learning from different trajectories of citizens' involvement in urban change
AU - Rodriguez, Luis
AU - Castán Broto, Vanesa
AU - Ortiz, Catalina
AU - Lipietz, Barbara
AU - Osuteye, Emmanuel
AU - Johnson, Cassidy
AU - Kombe, Wilbard
AU - Mtwangi-Limbumba, Tatu
AU - Cazanave Macías, Joiselen
AU - Desmaison, Belen
AU - Hadny, Annisa
AU - Kisembo, Teddy
AU - Koroma, Braima
AU - Macarthy, Joseph
AU - Mbabazi, Judith
AU - Lwasa, Shuaib
AU - Pérez-Castro, Brenda
AU - Peña Díaz, Jorge
AU - Rodríguez Rivero, Luis
AU - Levy, Caren
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - The involvement of citizens and communities in processes that affect their lives and livelihoods through co- production methods has gained currency in recent years as a method to deliver place-based action capable of advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Co-production represents a promising approach that addresses criticisms leveraged against community-oriented and participatory planning approaches. In this paper, we investigate the potential of co-production methods to advance different dimensions of urban equality in urban environments, including progress towards equitable distribution of resources and services, the reciprocal recognition of communities and institutions, the access to political and decision-making processes, and the recognition of multiple forms of knowledge and perspectives. First, the paper reviews what is unique about co-production as a method in urban development planning. Co- production is distinct because it focuses on delivering a shared outcome. In doing so, it challenges epistemic injustices. Second, the paper presents a collective assessment of the outcomes of co-production practices in six different cities. The comparative analysis of these experiences shows that multiple co-production practices can help to establish long-term, adaptable partnerships to deliver urban equality. However, such a process requires constant adjustment and trade-offs to achieve equality gains in different domains. For that reason, the trans- formative impacts of co-production are not always measurable, even when its role in social change is evident
AB - The involvement of citizens and communities in processes that affect their lives and livelihoods through co- production methods has gained currency in recent years as a method to deliver place-based action capable of advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Co-production represents a promising approach that addresses criticisms leveraged against community-oriented and participatory planning approaches. In this paper, we investigate the potential of co-production methods to advance different dimensions of urban equality in urban environments, including progress towards equitable distribution of resources and services, the reciprocal recognition of communities and institutions, the access to political and decision-making processes, and the recognition of multiple forms of knowledge and perspectives. First, the paper reviews what is unique about co-production as a method in urban development planning. Co- production is distinct because it focuses on delivering a shared outcome. In doing so, it challenges epistemic injustices. Second, the paper presents a collective assessment of the outcomes of co-production practices in six different cities. The comparative analysis of these experiences shows that multiple co-production practices can help to establish long-term, adaptable partnerships to deliver urban equality. However, such a process requires constant adjustment and trade-offs to achieve equality gains in different domains. For that reason, the trans- formative impacts of co-production are not always measurable, even when its role in social change is evident
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000573
M3 - Artículo
VL - 4
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Elsevier
JF - Elsevier
ER -