TY - JOUR
T1 - Building on the enriched hierarchical model of achievement motivation
T2 - Autonomous and controlling reasons underlying mastery goals
AU - Michou, Aikaterini
AU - Matos, Lennia
AU - Gargurevich, Rafael
AU - Gumus, Burcin
AU - Herrera, Dora
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Two motivational theories - the Achievement Goal Theory and Self-Determination Theory - have recently been combined to explain students' motivation, making it possible to study the "what" and the "why" of learners' achievement strivings. The present study built on this approach by (a) investigating whether the distinction between autonomous or volitional and controlling or pressuring reasons can be meaningfully applied to the adoption of mastery-avoidance goals, (b) investigating the concurrent and prospective relations between mastery-avoidance goals and their underlying reasons and learning strategies when mastery-approach goals and their underlying reasons were also considered, and by (c) incorporating psychological need experiences as an explanatory variable in the relation between achievement motives (i.e., the motive to succeed and motive to avoid failure) and both mastery goals and their underlying reasons. In two Turkish university students samples (N = 226, Mage = 22.36; N = 331, Mage = 19.5), autonomous and controlling reasons appeared applicable to mastery-avoidance goals and regression and path analysis further showed that mastery-avoidance goals and their underlying autonomous reasons fail to predicted learning strategies over and above the pursuit of mastery-approach goals and their underlying reasons. Finally, need experiences were established as mediators between achievement motives and both mastery goals and their underlying reasons.
AB - Two motivational theories - the Achievement Goal Theory and Self-Determination Theory - have recently been combined to explain students' motivation, making it possible to study the "what" and the "why" of learners' achievement strivings. The present study built on this approach by (a) investigating whether the distinction between autonomous or volitional and controlling or pressuring reasons can be meaningfully applied to the adoption of mastery-avoidance goals, (b) investigating the concurrent and prospective relations between mastery-avoidance goals and their underlying reasons and learning strategies when mastery-approach goals and their underlying reasons were also considered, and by (c) incorporating psychological need experiences as an explanatory variable in the relation between achievement motives (i.e., the motive to succeed and motive to avoid failure) and both mastery goals and their underlying reasons. In two Turkish university students samples (N = 226, Mage = 22.36; N = 331, Mage = 19.5), autonomous and controlling reasons appeared applicable to mastery-avoidance goals and regression and path analysis further showed that mastery-avoidance goals and their underlying autonomous reasons fail to predicted learning strategies over and above the pursuit of mastery-approach goals and their underlying reasons. Finally, need experiences were established as mediators between achievement motives and both mastery goals and their underlying reasons.
KW - Achievement goals
KW - Autonomous reasons
KW - Controlling reasons
KW - Fear of failure
KW - Need for achievement
KW - Needs satisfaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992646594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5334/pb.281
DO - 10.5334/pb.281
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84992646594
SN - 0033-2879
VL - 56
SP - 269
EP - 287
JO - Psychologica Belgica
JF - Psychologica Belgica
IS - 3
ER -