TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond words
T2 - the relevance of autonomy-supportive language in university syllabi
AU - Herrera, Dora
AU - Lira-Delcore, Aranza
AU - Lira Luttges, Benjamín
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Herrera, Lira-Delcore and Lira Luttges.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction: University syllabi are a semester-long working tool through which professors present a thematic content program, precise assessment mechanisms, and establish the activities schedule, among other tasks. Teachers can promote high-quality motivation among students through syllabi. The goal of this research was to replicate a previous study on the impact of syllabus language on student motivation. Methods: Two studies were conducted. Study 1 aimed to examine, in 126 first- and second-year students in Humanities General Studies, how they perceive a syllabus with an autonomy-supportive “tone” vs. one with a controlling language. Study 2 explored, in 261 students, basic psychological needs (BPN) satisfaction and their affective approach to the course. Additionally, it investigated the type of motivation (autonomous vs. controlled) that students prioritize when selecting the course. Results: Findings from Study 1 suggest that autonomy-supportive syllabi are perceived as more attractive, fair, and respectful from the student’s perspective. Results from Study 2 indicate that autonomy-supportive syllabi are related to a better perception of the course, greater BPN satisfaction, and autonomous motivation from students, increasing the probability of them choosing that subject. Discussion: It is concluded that promoting autonomy, even through the written language shared between teachers and students, is important for improving teaching quality.
AB - Introduction: University syllabi are a semester-long working tool through which professors present a thematic content program, precise assessment mechanisms, and establish the activities schedule, among other tasks. Teachers can promote high-quality motivation among students through syllabi. The goal of this research was to replicate a previous study on the impact of syllabus language on student motivation. Methods: Two studies were conducted. Study 1 aimed to examine, in 126 first- and second-year students in Humanities General Studies, how they perceive a syllabus with an autonomy-supportive “tone” vs. one with a controlling language. Study 2 explored, in 261 students, basic psychological needs (BPN) satisfaction and their affective approach to the course. Additionally, it investigated the type of motivation (autonomous vs. controlled) that students prioritize when selecting the course. Results: Findings from Study 1 suggest that autonomy-supportive syllabi are perceived as more attractive, fair, and respectful from the student’s perspective. Results from Study 2 indicate that autonomy-supportive syllabi are related to a better perception of the course, greater BPN satisfaction, and autonomous motivation from students, increasing the probability of them choosing that subject. Discussion: It is concluded that promoting autonomy, even through the written language shared between teachers and students, is important for improving teaching quality.
KW - autonomy-support
KW - basic psychological needs
KW - control
KW - self-determination theory
KW - syllabi
KW - syllabus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219279549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536821
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536821
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219279549
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1536821
ER -