Why might home-based work duties be perceived by female academics as extreme? A qualitative study

Mohamed Mousa, Beatrice Avolio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to answer the following question: Why might home-based work duties be perceived by female academics as extreme? Design/methodology/approach: We employed a qualitative research method through semi-structured interviews with 33 female academics from three public universities selected from amongst 26 public institutions of higher education in Egypt. Thematic analysis was subsequently used to determine the main ideas in the transcripts. Findings: We find that the sudden implementation of home-based work makes the academic duties of female academics extreme. Moreover, the following four factors help explain the extremity/intensity of the home-based work of female academics: mental and physical fatigue resulting from WFH, the inability to adequately meet family commitments when working from home (WFH), poor resources for home-based work and reduced ability to focus on the obstacles facing them in their academic career. Originality/value: This paper contributes by filling a gap in human resources management and higher education in which empirical studies on female academics WFH and extreme academic duties have been limited so far.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1259-1274
Number of pages16
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Egypt
  • Extreme jobs
  • Female academics
  • Job demand-control theory
  • Public universities
  • Work from home (WFH)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why might home-based work duties be perceived by female academics as extreme? A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this