22 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a systematic review involving the techniques or methods of web accessibility currently used, the domains that have been covered and the disabilities that were focused. The search strategy identified 343 studies, where only 20 were finally selected for the review. We found that automatic tools are the most frequent techniques used to evaluate web accessibility. In addition, most studies performed in the educational domain and the majority of studies do not focus on a special disability.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Practice and Case Studies - 8th International Conference, DUXU 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Proceedings
EditorsAaron Marcus, Wentao Wang
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages226-237
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783030235345
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
Event8th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability, DUXU 2019, held as part of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2019 - Orlando, United States
Duration: 26 Jul 201931 Jul 2019

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume11586 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference8th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability, DUXU 2019, held as part of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2019
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period26/07/1931/07/19

Keywords

  • Evaluation methods
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Software applications
  • Systematic review
  • Web accessibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Web Accessibility Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this