Situación de la confianza en la teoría fundamentada versus la modelación de ecuaciones estructurales: Un estudio bibliométrico comparativo para la administración

Translated title of the contribution: Situation of trust in grounded theory versus structural equation modeling: A comparative bibliometric study for management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The quantitative and qualitative paradigms are used by millions of researchers, but the level of confidence deposited in each one of them it is not known. The aim of the bibliometric article is to study the grounded theory versus the structural equations modeling in order to determine in which of the two methodolo-gies the scientific community relies the most. Through descriptive and regression statistics, the most relevant findings are that, although the scientific community relies slightly more on the quantitative than on the qualitative paradigm, this situation would tend to re-vert by 2022, taking a turn towards the qualitative one.

Translated title of the contributionSituation of trust in grounded theory versus structural equation modeling: A comparative bibliometric study for management
Original languageSpanish
Article numbereib0835811102
Pages (from-to)37-53
Number of pages17
JournalInvestigacion Bibliotecologica
Volume34
Issue number83
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Situation of trust in grounded theory versus structural equation modeling: A comparative bibliometric study for management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this