Procedures With Longer Intraoperative Times Undervalue Surgeon Work in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Large, Nationwide Database Study

Background: Work relative value units (wRVUs) measure a surgeon's time and intensity required to perform the pre-service, intra-service, and post-service work of a surgical procedure and are commonly used to compare a physician's work between different procedures. Previous literature across multiple specialties report that longer, often revision, operations are undervalued when compared to primary procedures. Our study aims to analyze the differences in intra-operative time, and its corresponding wRVU/h between the Medicare benchmarks and real-world time-stamped data for total joint arthroplasty procedures. Methods: Thirteen primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were identified, and intra-operative times were collected using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases from 2014 to 2019. The Relative Value Scale Update Committee's (RUC) estimated median intra-operative times for each procedure was compared to the calculated median intra-operative times from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, as were their corresponding wRVU/h. Procedures were additionally stratified by “long” (>110 minutes) and “short” (≤110 minutes) intra-operative times. Results: The RUC over-estimated intra-operative time by 35.24% on average and this overestimation was more profound in longer operations than shorter operations (47.75% vs 15.22%, P = .011). The RUC intensity per unit time values (wRVU/h) between “long” and “short” procedures were significantly different (P < .001) and showed the undervaluation of intensity for the longer procedures by an average of 3.47 wRVU/h. Conclusion: Our study provides further evidence that physician work is undervalued in revision total hip and knee surgeries.