Penal extractivism: A qualitative study on punishment and extractive industries in Peru

Diego Tuesta, Maritza Paredes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of penal extractivism in the punishment and society literature. We define penal extractivism as the punitive strategies that a state implements to safeguard extractive industries from citizens’ contention. This concept addresses the limitations of categories like criminalization, protest policing, social control, and labour discipline while bridging the gap between punishment studies and research on extractive industries. Additionally, we draw upon evidence of the Espinar mining conflict in Peru to explain five punitive strategies the state uses to handle protests: (1) off-duty policing and critical assets legislation, (2) state of emergency declarations, (3) police or prosecutorial notes against environmental defenders, (4) criminal indictments, and (5) the transferring of criminal cases to distant jurisdictions. Based on our findings, we argue that penal extractivism is a dynamic and ambivalent project that targets marginalized rural populations. The state partially deters mobilizations but fails to address the underlying social unrest, reinforcing the conditions that perpetuate mining conflicts. This in-depth within-case analysis examines the relationship between punishment and extractivism in the global context of contemporary social mobilizations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPunishment and Society
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • criminalization
  • Espinar
  • extractive industries
  • extractive penality
  • extractivism
  • penal extractivism
  • Peru

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Penal extractivism: A qualitative study on punishment and extractive industries in Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this