TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of the right to prior consultation in the Andean countries. A comparative perspective
AU - Urteaga-Crovetto, Patricia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - During the late 1990s and early 2000s, Andean countries had for the most part adopted the ILO's Convention 169. Once included in the national juridical systems, the right to consultation was positivized by means of different rules, regulations and decisions that eventually subsumed its political substance. In this paper, I analyze the processes to adopt and implement the right to Prior Consultation in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. In exploring them, I will shed light on the technicalities of the law, which not only depoliticize self-determination but also reshape indigenous peoples.
AB - During the late 1990s and early 2000s, Andean countries had for the most part adopted the ILO's Convention 169. Once included in the national juridical systems, the right to consultation was positivized by means of different rules, regulations and decisions that eventually subsumed its political substance. In this paper, I analyze the processes to adopt and implement the right to Prior Consultation in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. In exploring them, I will shed light on the technicalities of the law, which not only depoliticize self-determination but also reshape indigenous peoples.
KW - Andean countries
KW - Right to consultation
KW - legal implementation
KW - legal technicalities
KW - procedimentalization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042916157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07329113.2018.1435616
DO - 10.1080/07329113.2018.1435616
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042916157
SN - 0732-9113
VL - 50
SP - 7
EP - 30
JO - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
JF - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
IS - 1
ER -