Impartiality, gender stereotypes and judiciary corruption

Rocío Villanueva Flores

Impartiality, gender stereotypes and judiciary corruption

Rocío Villanueva Flores

Sección de Derecho

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article analyzes gender stereotypes in legal reasoning in contexts of severe judiciary corruption, which results in the violation of impartiality. The author maintains that it is the impunity of judiciary corruption, associated with structural discrimination, which largely explains the cynicism in legal rulings on gender violence. She also proposes that judicial virtues are essential to face corruption in the judicial arena.

Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	363-394
Number of pages	32
Journal	Derecho PUCP
State	Published - 1 Jun 2021

Cite this

@article{d078e64300e24756a309b5c4a90993b9,

title = "Impartiality, gender stereotypes and judiciary corruption",

abstract = "This article analyzes gender stereotypes in legal reasoning in contexts of severe judiciary corruption, which results in the violation of impartiality. The author maintains that it is the impunity of judiciary corruption, associated with structural discrimination, which largely explains the cynicism in legal rulings on gender violence. She also proposes that judicial virtues are essential to face corruption in the judicial arena.",

author = "\{Villanueva Flores\}, Roc{\'i}o",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

pages = "363--394",

journal = "Derecho PUCP",

issn = "0251-3420",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impartiality, gender stereotypes and judiciary corruption

AU - Villanueva Flores, Rocío

PY - 2021/6/1

Y1 - 2021/6/1

N2 - This article analyzes gender stereotypes in legal reasoning in contexts of severe judiciary corruption, which results in the violation of impartiality. The author maintains that it is the impunity of judiciary corruption, associated with structural discrimination, which largely explains the cynicism in legal rulings on gender violence. She also proposes that judicial virtues are essential to face corruption in the judicial arena.

AB - This article analyzes gender stereotypes in legal reasoning in contexts of severe judiciary corruption, which results in the violation of impartiality. The author maintains that it is the impunity of judiciary corruption, associated with structural discrimination, which largely explains the cynicism in legal rulings on gender violence. She also proposes that judicial virtues are essential to face corruption in the judicial arena.

M3 - Artículo

SN - 0251-3420

SP - 363

EP - 394

JO - Derecho PUCP

JF - Derecho PUCP

ER -