TY - CHAP
T1 - Ideen I Confronting Its Critics
AU - Lerner, Rosemary R.P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The publication of Ideen I had a cold reception and was marked by a general misunderstanding and an increasing distancing from it by twentieth century phenomenologists. Some of its most conspicuous critiques are those purported by Heidegger, Ricoeur, and Boehm, which are here examined against the background of the 1913 text and of Husserl’s unpublished manuscripts. The author attempts to show that in spite of its undeniably misleading terminology, Ideen I’s basic intuitions are currently valid, so that more attention should be paid to them in contemporary philosophical debates, both theoretical and practical.
AB - The publication of Ideen I had a cold reception and was marked by a general misunderstanding and an increasing distancing from it by twentieth century phenomenologists. Some of its most conspicuous critiques are those purported by Heidegger, Ricoeur, and Boehm, which are here examined against the background of the 1913 text and of Husserl’s unpublished manuscripts. The author attempts to show that in spite of its undeniably misleading terminology, Ideen I’s basic intuitions are currently valid, so that more attention should be paid to them in contemporary philosophical debates, both theoretical and practical.
KW - Natural Attitude
KW - Phenomenological Reduction
KW - Pure Consciousness
KW - Transcendental Idealism
KW - Transcendental Phenomenology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84946721203
U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-5213-9_25
DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-5213-9_25
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84946721203
T3 - Contributions To Phenomenology
SP - 415
EP - 431
BT - Contributions To Phenomenology
PB - Springer Nature
ER -