El mejor remedio para un mal abogado podría ser... ¿otro abogado?

Translated title of the contribution: For a bad lawyer… could another lawyer be the best remedy?

Erick E. Vargas Guevara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, the author states that every lawyer should be compelled to denounce before the corresponding bar association or the judge the cases of abuse of process that damages clients, so the (bad) lawyer, who is behind of these practices, can be punished. The author remarks the fact that, although judges and bar associations are the main protagonists in the punishment of abuse of process, the recognition of this lawyer’s duty can contribute to clients’ rights protection and the consolidation of rule of law. From this perspective, the author proposes that every abuse of process circumstance is perpetrated because a lawyer incited it or because he or she consented it; for this reason, a (bad) lawyer will always be the one who caused the abuse. Precisely, one “remedy” for a lawyer involved in these practices consists in recognize the duty of all lawyers to denounce the (bad) colleagues, in defense of clients and rule of law.

Translated title of the contributionFor a bad lawyer… could another lawyer be the best remedy?
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)202-224
Number of pages23
JournalIus et Veritas
Volume2019
Issue number58
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'For a bad lawyer… could another lawyer be the best remedy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this