TY - JOUR
T1 - Dos factores que marcan las diferencias entre El No-vela, de Mercedes Pinto y El, pelicula de Luis Bunuel
AU - Giglio, Giovanna Pollarolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, National University of San Marcos. Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - The differences between Él (1952), a film by Luis Buñuel, and the novel Él, which the Canarian au-thor Mercedes Pinto published in 1926, can be studied based on the problems that every adaptation poses: “difference in languages”, “fidelity”, talent, needs expressions of the filmmaker, among other approaches. Without ignoring its validity, this paper is based on the premise that the inscription of Él as an autobiographical novel, as well as its feminine/feminist approach and its willingness to denounce domestic violence against women, and its goal of vindicating the divorce are the factors that make the radical difference with the film. Thus, Buñuel’s film will be approached from its fiction-al record and its approach that favors the role of the male gaze unlike Pinto’s novel. From there, the feminine/feminist perspective, absent in the film, will be discussed, from the notions of “feminine writing” and “women’s literature” raised by Nelly Richard (1994), in relation to the so-called “Tre-tas del débil” studied by Josefina Ludmer (2017 [1985]) that account for the precarious place that society grants to women and how this marginalization is expressed in writing.
AB - The differences between Él (1952), a film by Luis Buñuel, and the novel Él, which the Canarian au-thor Mercedes Pinto published in 1926, can be studied based on the problems that every adaptation poses: “difference in languages”, “fidelity”, talent, needs expressions of the filmmaker, among other approaches. Without ignoring its validity, this paper is based on the premise that the inscription of Él as an autobiographical novel, as well as its feminine/feminist approach and its willingness to denounce domestic violence against women, and its goal of vindicating the divorce are the factors that make the radical difference with the film. Thus, Buñuel’s film will be approached from its fiction-al record and its approach that favors the role of the male gaze unlike Pinto’s novel. From there, the feminine/feminist perspective, absent in the film, will be discussed, from the notions of “feminine writing” and “women’s literature” raised by Nelly Richard (1994), in relation to the so-called “Tre-tas del débil” studied by Josefina Ludmer (2017 [1985]) that account for the precarious place that society grants to women and how this marginalization is expressed in writing.
KW - Autobiography
KW - Autofiction
KW - Discursive Genre
KW - Female Writing
KW - Fiction
KW - Patriarchal Soci-ety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181759254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.30920/letras.94.140.9
DO - 10.30920/letras.94.140.9
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85181759254
SN - 0378-4878
VL - 94
SP - 118
EP - 133
JO - Letras (Peru)
JF - Letras (Peru)
IS - 140
ER -