Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material

  • Kibo Nam
  • , Ivan M. Rosado-Mendez
  • , Lauren A. Wirtzfeld
  • , Viksit Kumar
  • , Ernest L. Madsen
  • , Goutam Ghoshal
  • , Alexander D. Pawlicki
  • , Michael L. Oelze
  • , Roberto J. Lavarello
  • , Timothy A. Bigelow
  • , James A. Zagzebski
  • , William D. O'Brien
  • , Timothy J. Hall
  • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Iowa State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

A key step toward implementing quantitative ultrasound techniques in a clinical setting is demonstrating that parameters such as the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient (BSC) can be accurately estimated independent of the clinical imaging system used. In previous studies, agreement in BSC estimates for well characterized phantoms was demonstrated across different laboratory systems. The goal of this study was to compare the BSC estimates of a tissue mimicking sample measured using four clinical scanners, each providing RF echo data in the 1-15 MHz frequency range. The sample was previously described and characterized with single-element transducer systems. Using a reference phantom for analysis, excellent quantitative agreement was observed across the four array-based imaging systems for BSC estimates. Additionally, the estimates from data acquired with the clinical systems agreed with theoretical predictions and with estimates from laboratory measurements using single-element transducers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1319-1324
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this