Abstract
Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been considered the benchmark, with excellent clinical outcomes and low rates of aseptic loosening at the long-term follow-up. However, alterations of the bone/cement interface leading to aseptic loosening, particularly in younger and obese patients, along with increased life expectancy have led to a renewed interest in noncemented TKA fixation. Certain early noncemented designs exhibited higher rates of subsidence and component failure. Improvements in designs, materials, and surgical technique offer promise for improved results with contemporary noncemented TKA applications. In an increasing cost-conscious healthcare environment, implant cost is important to consider because press-fit prostheses are generally more expensive. However, this cost may be offset by shorter surgical times, cement costs, and the potential for osseous integration. Technological advances have improved the manufacturing of porous metals, with reported excellent midterm survivorship. Future prospective, randomized trials, and registry data are needed to delineate differences between cemented and noncemented fixation, survivorship, and patient-reported outcomes, especially in young, functionally active, and/or obese populations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E363-E379 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Apr 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cementless Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Historical Perspective to Contemporary Application'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver