A comparison of the computational performance of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares and alternating minimization algorithms for ℓ1 inverse problems

Paul Rodríguez, Brendt Wohlberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Alternating minimization algorithms with a shrinkage step, derived within the Split Bregman (SB) or Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) frameworks, have become very popular for ℓ1-regularized problems, including Total Variation and Basis Pursuit Denoising. It appears to be generally assumed that they deliver much better computational performance than older methods such as Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS). We show, however, that IRLS type methods are computationally competitive with SB/ADMM methods for a variety of problems, and in some cases outperform them.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2012 - Proceedings
Pages3069-3072
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2012 - Lake Buena Vista, FL, United States
Duration: 30 Sep 20123 Oct 2012

Publication series

NameProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP
ISSN (Print)1522-4880

Conference

Conference2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityLake Buena Vista, FL
Period30/09/123/10/12

Keywords

  • Inverse Problems
  • Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares
  • Split-Bregman
  • Total Variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the computational performance of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares and alternating minimization algorithms for ℓ1 inverse problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this