A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

Zhouhui Lian; Afzal Godil; Benjamin Bustos; Mohamed Daoudi; Jeroen Hermans; Shun Kawamura; Yukinori Kurita; Guillaume Lavoué; Hien Van Nguyen; Ryutarou Ohbuchi; Yuki Ohkita; Yuya Ohishi; Fatih Porikli; Martin Reuter; Ivan Sipiran; Dirk Smeets; Paul Suetens; Hedi Tabia; Dirk Vandermeulen

doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

Zhouhui Lian, Afzal Godil, Benjamin Bustos, Mohamed Daoudi, Jeroen Hermans, Shun Kawamura, Yukinori Kurita, Guillaume Lavoué, Hien Van Nguyen, Ryutarou Ohbuchi, Yuki Ohkita, Yuya Ohishi, Fatih Porikli, Martin Reuter, Ivan Sipiran, Dirk Smeets, Paul Suetens, Hedi Tabia, Dirk Vandermeulen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

165 Scopus citations

Abstract

Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval has become an active and important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. The aim of this paper is to measure and compare the performance of state-of-the-art methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The paper develops a new benchmark consisting of 600 non-rigid 3D watertight meshes, which are equally classified into 30 categories, to carry out experiments for 11 different algorithms, whose retrieval accuracies are evaluated using six commonly utilized measures. Models and evaluation tools of the new benchmark are publicly available on our web site [1].

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	449-461
Number of pages	13
Journal	Pattern Recognition
Volume	46
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014
State	Published - Jan 2013
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

3D shape retrieval
Benchmark
Non-rigid

Access to Document

10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

Cite this

Lian, Z., Godil, A., Bustos, B., Daoudi, M., Hermans, J., Kawamura, S., Kurita, Y., Lavoué, G., Van Nguyen, H., Ohbuchi, R., Ohkita, Y., Ohishi, Y., Porikli, F., Reuter, M., Sipiran, I., Smeets, D., Suetens, P., Tabia, H., & Vandermeulen, D. (2013). A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. Pattern Recognition, 46(1), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

@article{9b1bd68f883b4eeca30cffac63d931e8,

title = "A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval",

abstract = "Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval has become an active and important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. The aim of this paper is to measure and compare the performance of state-of-the-art methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The paper develops a new benchmark consisting of 600 non-rigid 3D watertight meshes, which are equally classified into 30 categories, to carry out experiments for 11 different algorithms, whose retrieval accuracies are evaluated using six commonly utilized measures. Models and evaluation tools of the new benchmark are publicly available on our web site [1].",

keywords = "3D shape retrieval, Benchmark, Non-rigid",

author = "Zhouhui Lian and Afzal Godil and Benjamin Bustos and Mohamed Daoudi and Jeroen Hermans and Shun Kawamura and Yukinori Kurita and Guillaume Lavou{\'e} and {Van Nguyen}, Hien and Ryutarou Ohbuchi and Yuki Ohkita and Yuya Ohishi and Fatih Porikli and Martin Reuter and Ivan Sipiran and Dirk Smeets and Paul Suetens and Hedi Tabia and Dirk Vandermeulen",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "449--461",

journal = "Pattern Recognition",

issn = "0031-3203",

number = "1",

}

Lian, Z, Godil, A, Bustos, B, Daoudi, M, Hermans, J, Kawamura, S, Kurita, Y, Lavoué, G, Van Nguyen, H, Ohbuchi, R, Ohkita, Y, Ohishi, Y, Porikli, F, Reuter, M, Sipiran, I, Smeets, D, Suetens, P, Tabia, H & Vandermeulen, D 2013, 'A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval', Pattern Recognition, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

AU - Lian, Zhouhui

AU - Godil, Afzal

AU - Bustos, Benjamin

AU - Daoudi, Mohamed

AU - Hermans, Jeroen

AU - Kawamura, Shun

AU - Kurita, Yukinori

AU - Lavoué, Guillaume

AU - Van Nguyen, Hien

AU - Ohbuchi, Ryutarou

AU - Ohkita, Yuki

AU - Ohishi, Yuya

AU - Porikli, Fatih

AU - Reuter, Martin

AU - Sipiran, Ivan

AU - Smeets, Dirk

AU - Suetens, Paul

AU - Tabia, Hedi

AU - Vandermeulen, Dirk

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval has become an active and important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. The aim of this paper is to measure and compare the performance of state-of-the-art methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The paper develops a new benchmark consisting of 600 non-rigid 3D watertight meshes, which are equally classified into 30 categories, to carry out experiments for 11 different algorithms, whose retrieval accuracies are evaluated using six commonly utilized measures. Models and evaluation tools of the new benchmark are publicly available on our web site [1].

AB - Non-rigid 3D shape retrieval has become an active and important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. The aim of this paper is to measure and compare the performance of state-of-the-art methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The paper develops a new benchmark consisting of 600 non-rigid 3D watertight meshes, which are equally classified into 30 categories, to carry out experiments for 11 different algorithms, whose retrieval accuracies are evaluated using six commonly utilized measures. Models and evaluation tools of the new benchmark are publicly available on our web site [1].

KW - 3D shape retrieval

KW - Benchmark

KW - Non-rigid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866012196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866012196

SN - 0031-3203

VL - 46

SP - 449

EP - 461

JO - Pattern Recognition

JF - Pattern Recognition

IS - 1

ER -

A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this