Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Philosophy of right without Science of Logic?: an ongoing debate on Hegel's social philosophy
(Verifiche, 2022-01-01)
The question posed in the title of this contribution alludes to the attempts of some contemporary authors, among them that of Axel Honneth, to update the central approaches of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, but precisely and deliberately disregarding their supposed dependence on his Science of Logic. Answering that question is not easy for various reasons, methodological and hermeneutical. It is well known that Hegel emphatically maintains the dependence between both works and philosophical projects, but there is no consensus among the specialists about what real weight and of what type the Logic on the Philosophy of Right has. On the other hand, it is evident that any social philosophy requires a logical conception in the broad sense, be it Hegelian or otherwise, even more so if the intention is to update the Hegelian construction implicit in the concept of freedom. In any case, the discussion seems to show a paradoxical fact that consists in simultaneously affirming the actuality and obsolescence of the Hegelian conception of practical reason.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Interview with Miguel Giusti
(Universidad Complutense Madrid, 2024-11-20)
Miguel Giusti is a renowned specialist in German philosophy and a passionate promoter of academic events that lead to the analysis of the contemporary world. Recently, within the framework of the XXV World Congress of Philosophy in Rome, he was elected member of the Steering Committee of the International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP). In the interview, he tells us about his intellectual itinerary and gives an account of the persistent challenges to continue thinking about today.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Hegel and Husserl on Phenomenology, Logic, and the System of Sciences: A Reappraisal
(Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2023-12-01)
Husserl envisages transcendental phenomenology as a radically founding science that lays bare the higher-order experiences whereby logic and a theory of science become constituted. On the other hand, according to a usual presentation of Hegel’s philosophy, phenomenology is “logic’s precondition,” and science presents itself as its “result.” This alleged precedence of Hegel’s phenomenology (with its experiential and historical horizons) regarding logic may be a motif behind the current affinities recently traced between Hegelian and Husserlian notions of phenomenology that highlight their views on experience, history, and the lifeworld. This paper offers instead a reconsideration of aspects of their philosophies mostly challenged or dismissed since the rise of positivism: a reappraisal of their views on the relationship between phenomenology, logic, and philosophy as an “absolute” system of sciences. The argument is made that the irreconcilable difference between their projects ultimately stands on the radical contrast between Hegel’s speculative-conceptual method and system of sciences and Husserl’s foundational science and method as experiential-phenomenological all the way through. Despite this methodological abyss, this paper vindicates their affinities in their refusal to segregate science from life, and their attempts to overcome modernity’s inherited fragmentation of culture by providing an all-unifying approach to philosophy.
2

Producción científica

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results